Pulling Codes: Advanced Misfire and Fuel Trim Analysis — A P030X Detailed Analysis – UnderhoodService

Pulling Codes: Advanced Misfire and Fuel Trim Analysis — A P030X Detailed Analysis

Carlton Banks documents the use of fuel trims and oxygen sensor behavior to determine if the misfire activity is ignition, engine mechanical or fuel related.

This article will document the use of fuel trims and oxygen sensor behavior to determine if the misfire activity is ignition, engine mechanical or fuel related. We will address this in a two-part series from the viewpoint of moments in time to offer a deeper understanding of these concepts.

Our first article on this subject will address ignition-related misfires. We will explore other misfire research in the next article. The first step is to visualize these failures from the beginning figures 1 and 1a: pre- and post-oxygen sensors under normal activity.— picture that an ignition-related misfire has occurred on a subject vehicle. We come to define it as a single cylinder misfire, prior to failure the pre-oxygen is switching and working as designed. The post-oxygen sensor is also working as designed and almost appears as a straight line when looked at per graphical data or a Pico lab scope. ­Figures 1 and 1a denote how the pre- and post-oxygen sensors may look on a subject vehicle prior to any type of misfire-related activity.

Let’s use a 2007 Ford Taurus as an example. The IDS scan tool will be used to show the activity.figures 2 and 2a: pre- and post-oxygen sensors under ­ignition misfire activity.

Figures 2 and 2a denote the activity of the pre- and post-oxygen sensors at the initial point of ignition misfire activity. A close examination shows the pre-oxygen sensor went low, indicating that it saw oxygen in the exhaust stream at the very moment the misfire activity occurred. The post-oxygen sensor went high, indicating how the vehicle has a tendency to run (rich).

Note that at the very point of failure, the short-term fuel trim (STFT) will increase and, depending on design and strategy of the system, may show impressive numbers for short term, after the processor has acknowledged this, the resources of long-term fuel trim (LTFT) will work to get the short-term numbers back as close as possible to at or near zero. The end result is that after corrective action has taken place by the processor, there will not be a significant impact on the total fuel trim (ST + LT). This analysis is based on a subject vehicle that has good fuel trim values to start with. A range of +/-5% is optimal on many systems today, but a range of +/-10% may be acceptable.

A great example is a vehicle that has a total correction of 15% prior to fault; you’ll have higher numbers once ignition misfire activity occurs. I’ve found that on many vehicles with ignition misfire activity after the corrective action has taken place, single-digit numbers appear to be reasonable.


2004 Chevy Impala

Now let’s take a look at a 2004 Chevrolet Impala with a P0300 stored in memory.figure 3: the firing order shows that cylinders 5 and 2 are sister cylinders.

Upon review of this failure, note that the vehicle has a misfire code and freeze-frame information as well. The data shows that a STFT of -4% and a LTFT of 7% was noted; this is a total correction of 3%, which is not a significant impact on the total fuel trim correction. Figure 4: Is this misfire activity ignition or fuel related?

The misfire activity appears to be on cylinders 2 and 5, and, based on service information, it appears that these two cylinders are companion cylinders. See ­Figures 3 and 4. After careful review of this case study, it was clear that a bad coil assembly was at fault. The Tech 2 scan tool was used for this analysis. This observer would also ask that you take into ­account systems that will turn off the injectors when misfire activity occurs, the fuel trim values will go to zero once the fault is set.

This Pulling Codes case is now considered closed, however, we invite any questions concerning this fault analysis. 


You May Also Like

Carbon Deposits and Direct Injection Engines

The primary cause of these problems is that fuel and added detergents are not hitting the back of the intake valves.

In the late ‘90s and early 2000s, TSBs related to carbon deposits on the valves were few and far between. There are three reasons why direct-injection engines are more prone to carbon deposits. One reason is unique to direct injection, and the remaining two are problems for port fuel-injection engines that are made worse by direct injection.

Diagnosing Misfires

What if there are no codes and a misfire is intermittent? This is where it gets complicated.

Acura Turbo Engine Service

It is important to check the operation of the solenoids that control vacuum to the actuators.

Subaru EJ25 Head Gasket Problems

Most of the EJ head gasket failures occur around the 100,000-mile mark and start as a slow oil or coolant leak.

Honda Electronic Throttle Body Service Tips

Using care and following OEM procedures will help you to avoid unnecessary parts replacement and comebacks.

Other Posts

Selling Underhood Parts for Hybrids

Anything that can happen to an ICE in a standard vehicle can happen in a hybrid.

Determining Catalytic Converter Efficiency

Almost every part on the engine determines how long a catalytic converter will last.

New Oil Specifications

Many 0W16 oils have a new donut certification mark on the bottle called API SN-PLUS and SN-PLUS Resource Conserving.

Solving Intermittent Overheating

New cooling systems anticipate and influence changes in coolant temperature.